Las Vegas Office: 702.254.4455
Henderson Office: 702.433.4455
Jeffrey Burr Logo

Oftentimes the most treasured pieces of property in an estate are those items which you do not hold formal legal title to. Unlike a car or home where ownership is evidenced by a title or deed, there are typically no such records for family heirlooms such as china dishes, jewelry, photo albums or vinyl records signed by the Beach Boys.

When the owner of these personal property items dies, the items are generally given to the beneficiaries named in the owner’s will or trust. But oftentimes the items are given by way of general provisions. For example, a will may provide that half of a person’s entire estate will go to Son and the other half will go to Daughter. In that case, half of the personal property items will go to Son and half will go to Daughter. The executor ultimately decides how to allocate the personal property items between Son and Daughter ,which may cause a rift between Son and Daughter if they do not see eye to eye on who gets what. They may ultimately decide to go to court to resolve their dispute, which costs time and money. The person creating the will or trust could specifically designate which items of personal property will go to Son and which will go to Daughter to avoid this outcome; however, this can be difficult because people collect, lose, and gift personal property items to family and friends throughout their lives. Thus, what a person owns in terms of personal property is not static. Because of this, drafting a specific provision for each personal property item in a will or trust would likely be inefficient, as the document would need to be continually updated to reflect a current inventory and disposition of that inventory.

Fortunately, Nevada law does not require this kind of drafting and instead offers an alternative, which allows a will or trust to reference another document known as a "List Disposing of Tangible Personal Property". This list is legally binding and can govern the disposition of personal property items.

To be legally binding, the list must contain the following:

  1. The date the list is executed;
  2. A title on the document indicating its purpose (such as, "List Disposing of Tangible Personal Property");
  3. A reference to the will or trust to which it relates;
  4. A reasonably certain description of the item to be disposed of and the beneficiaries; and
  5. The handwritten or electronic signature of the person disposing of the property.

This list may be prepared before or after a will or trust is executed and it can be altered or amended at any time.

To take advantage of this statutory provision that allows for the disposition of tangible personal property by list contact one of our attorneys and we can help you to create a comprehensive estate plan where these most treasured items will be disposed of according to your wishes, thereby reducing the potential in-fighting among your beneficiaries.

The recent decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges made clear that same-sex couples have the right to marry nationwide.  In so holding, all states must formally recognize same-sex marriages that were legally entered into in other states.  In addition, states cannot deny applications for marriage licenses for individuals of the same gender.

The ruling clarifies that same-sex married couples now have the same legal rights that are enjoyed by opposite-sex couples.  It allows same-sex married couples to take advantage of estate planning techniques historically afforded only to husband and wife.  At the same time, it also raises issues concerning the property rights and obligations of same-sex couples who have already been married for a number of years.

While marriage equality may now be universally recognized across the nation, state laws of descent and distribution are no substitute for creating a customized estate plan that clearly reflects one’s wishes. State laws often produce undesired or unintended results, especially in an area where legal rights have only just been pronounced and may apply retroactively.  Good reasons apply equally to all persons to proactively plan for the orderly distribution of their estate in documents that will be legally respected in the event of death or incapacity.

Please contact us for a free 30-minute review of your estate plan to make sure it follows your wishes.

-Attorney Kari L. Stephens

The main component of the estate plan for most people is a revocable living trust that they establish during their lifetime. The terms of the revocable living trust control the disposition of any asset titled in the name of the trust.  Trust assets can include real estate, investment accounts, financial accounts, stocks and bonds, certificates of deposit, vehicles and other personal property.  The revocable living trust can also be the joint owner of an asset, most commonly with an individual.  When the individual dies, the revocable living trust becomes the sole owner of the asset and the asset is subject to the terms of the trust.   The revocable living trust can also be the designated beneficiary of an asset such as a life insurance policy, a retirement plan and an annuity.  The proceeds are payable to the trustee of the revocable living trust, and again the ultimate disposition of these proceeds are controlled by the terms of the trust.  An asset can also contain a payable on death (POD) designation wherein the asset is payable to the trust upon the death of the owner.  So why should one have a last will and testament if they have established and funded a revocable living trust?

Even when a person establishes a revocable living trust, unfortunately periodically one or more of the person’s assets such as a vehicle or a bank account or even real estate does not get properly re-titled into the revocable living trust for whatever reason.  In this situation, when the trustor dies the vehicle or bank account or real estate is in the name of the deceased trustor alone and the disposition of the asset is controlled by the terms of the last will and testament of the decedent.  Accordingly, even an estate plan that has a revocable living trust always includes a last will and testament.  The will is oftentimes referred to as a “pourover will”, as it provides that any asset is “poured over” into the revocable living trust to be held in trust and disposed of pursuant to the terms and conditions of the revocable living trust.

In summary, one’s estate plan should always include a last will and testament even though the person has established a revocable living trust.  Although the goal is to never have to use the last will and testament, it is a safety net, providing that an asset not properly titled in the name of the revocable living trust at the time of death shall pass to the trust to be disposed of pursuant to the terms and conditions of the revocable living trust.

-Attorney John R. Mugan

Congratulations to Jeffrey Burr and John Mugan for once again being name in the 2015 Mountain States Super Lawyers Magazine.  Read more here:
http://digital.superlawyers.com/superlawyers/mxslrs15#pg1

Jeffrey L. Burr

John R. Mugan

If you have been keeping up on the reading of our newsletters, blog posts, and other mailers, you might have noticed that we have been urging our clients to review their current estate planning documents with their estate planning attorney.  Undoubtedly, it is very likely that if your estate plan has not been updated prior to 2009, that updates to your existing plan are warranted.  Either changes in the laws governing your estate planning documents or changes in your life or the lives of your beneficiaries’ are the catalyst for these necessary updates.

Many clients are surprised to learn that their current trust may be unnecessarily complex given some not-so-recent changes to the federal estate tax laws.  Since 2011, a feature of the new estate tax laws is the concept of “portability” of the federal estate tax exemption between married couples.  In simple terms, portability of the federal estate tax exemption between married couples means that if the first spouse dies and the value of the estate does not require the use of all of the deceased spouse’s federal exemption from estate taxes, then the amount of the exemption that was not used for the deceased spouse’s estate may be transferred to the surviving spouse’s exemption so that he or she can use the deceased spouse’s unused exemption plus his or her own exemption when the surviving spouse later dies.  Even more simply stated, portability provides relief from the complex A-B trusts that were commonly drafted prior to 2011.  Relief from the complex A-B trust structure means that your spouse will not have to be subject to onerous and unnecessary complexity that involves significant time and expense upon your death; but requires an update to your existing trust if it still contains the A-B trust provisions.

In 2009, laws at the state level were overhauled in the areas affecting your general durable power of attorney and health care power of attorney.  Failure to update these documents may potentially cause unnecessary delay, during what can already be a very difficult time, while you are incapacitated.

It has been our experience in reviewing existing estate plans with our clients that certain life events have caused their plans to become ineffective or inconsistent with their present intents and desires.  It is important that you take an inventory of your assets while checking title on these assets.  If you have sold or refinanced your home or opened new financial accounts, then you may want to verify that title is held by your trust.  It would also be prudent to verify the beneficiary designations on assets like life insurance policies and IRAs or other qualified accounts.  The underlying purpose of these suggestions is to ensure that your estate does not become subject to probate upon your death.

In addition to a change in a client’s asset inventory, certain life events such as the death of a loved one, children reaching adulthood or the birth of grandchildren may cause you to reevaluate your existing estate plan and consider other updates.  Lastly, there are a number of other important considerations that may cause you to strongly consider updating your existing plan.  The following is a short list of such considerations:

 
A. Collins Hunsaker

If it has been years since you have had your estate plan reviewed by your estate planning attorney or you have concerns that your existing plan may not be designed to meet your present intents and desires, we strongly encourage you to call our office to schedule a consultation for a review.

-Attorney A. Collins Hunsaker

Trust decanting.  It’s a fancy and fascinating sounding topic, right?  Well, maybe only to my estate planning peers.  Nevada updated its trust decanting statute this last legislative session and the changes become effective on October 1, 2015, and can be found in Senate Bill 484.

You may have heard of decanting for liquids.  Let’s say that I don’t like the container that is holding my lemonade.  I can take my lemonade and pour it, or decantit, into a nicer container.  Maybe it’s a nice glass pitcher.  Perhaps it’s an etched crystal carafe in which it can better breathe.

Of course nobody really decants lemonade.  I’m pretty sure decanting is reserved to liquor and wine.

But it’s an analogy to what is available for an irrevocable trust.  Trust decanting allows an irrevocable trust’s assets to be poured to another irrevocable trust.  Often, the goal of the decanting is to change some quality of the original trust or to fix something that was overlooked.  Nevada’s statutes detail what is permitted to be changed in the new or second trust and the changes in our state law are an attempt to remain competitive with other states that cater to capturing trust business.

A few examples of why someone might want to decant a trust:

Nevada’s decanting statute also makes clear that an irrevocable trust that was created in another state, but which has the ability to change situs to Nevada, is eligible to fully utilize Nevada’s decanting statute.  The statute also confirms that the Trustee of the original trust is permissible to be the settlor of the second trust.

The statute governing trust decanting in Nevada is NRS 163.556.

Las Vegas Office
10000 W. Charleston Blvd., Suite 100
Las Vegas, NV 89135
Phone: 702.254.4455
Fax: 702.254.3330
Henderson Office
2600 Paseo Verde Parkway, Suite 200
Henderson, NV 89074
Phone: 702.433.4455
Fax: 702.451.1853
Subscribe to Our Newsletter

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
Email*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram